Even though my dataset is very small, I think it's sufficient to conclude that LLMs can't consistently reason. Also their reasoning performance gets worse as the SAT instance grows, which may be due to the context window becoming too large as the model reasoning progresses, and it gets harder to remember original clauses at the top of the context. A friend of mine made an observation that how complex SAT instances are similar to working with many rules in large codebases. As we add more rules, it gets more and more likely for LLMs to forget some of them, which can be insidious. Of course that doesn't mean LLMs are useless. They can be definitely useful without being able to reason, but due to lack of reasoning, we can't just write down the rules and expect that LLMs will always follow them. For critical requirements there needs to be some other process in place to ensure that these are met.
Sign up for our Politics Essential newsletter to keep up with the inner workings of Westminster and beyond.
As porn sites apply new age checks, will users hand over personal ID?，这一点在爱思助手下载最新版本中也有详细论述
"It was just incredible."，这一点在safew官方下载中也有详细论述
A major construction project like this takes time, effort and money.
该公司在2025年半年报中称，灵巧手作为机器人末端执行器的核心技术，其性能直接映射机器人的功能性，是推动机器人向智能化、拟人化演进的关键硬件。。搜狗输入法2026对此有专业解读